The Plea Deal Predicament

The plea deal system in the court can have both advantages and disadvantages. For those who are guilty, it offers an opportunity for them to acknowledge their wrongdoing and receive leniency in return. Prosecutors also find it easier to encourage defendants to take a plea deal rather than proceed to trial, saving the court both time and money.

This can be extremely concerning, especially when innocent individuals feel compelled to admit guilt to avoid risks associated with going to trial, such as the possibility of a harsher sentence if convicted.

Even more troubling are cases where innocent individuals maintain their innocence and reject plea deals but are still at risk of facing severe consequences, including lengthy sentences or life imprisonment if convicted at trial.

Prosecutors should prioritize seeking the truth and ensuring that the guilty are held accountable, while protecting the innocent from unjust convictions. Sadly, however, most would rather exploit the fear of potential outcomes to coerce defendants into taking plea deals, regardless of their innocence.

To address these concerns, it is essential for the legal system to focus on measures that promote fairness and safeguard the rights of defendants, especially when innocence is asserted. This may include reforms to encourage more rigorous examination of evidence, transparency in plea negotiations, and better access to legal representation.

We must hold them accountable.

How many more corners will our justice system cut just to get a conviction?

How many more innocent people will pay the price?

If you don’t see a major problem with our ‘justice system’ then you are a huge part of the problem.

Elisa Grant - 7/23/2023